This was taken by Smriti Shalini with a 3MP Camera. That’s right 3MP. Just goes to show how much can one achieve if you want and if you try.
The camera doesn’t take the picture the photographer does. A machine cannot visualize, you can.
An this is the difference between taking a photograph and making art.
K.S.
This was in front of my building two days back. I woke up to a loud noise in the middle of the night (enough to wake me up), checked and I saw a car lying in the middle of the […]
Here are a few prime locations for photography in Manipal to get you started. […]
Pattadakal Sent to us by Prof. Satyanarayan Shenoy. A fantastic view. I’m going to try to visit this place before I leave. K.S.
© Manipal Blog | 2007 - 2023
A very beautiful composition, the endless streams of cloud with the barren landscape give such a romantic feel! As though this is from one of those movies, that depict angst of a forlorn lover!
Taking nothing away from anyone, but megapixels don't really matter for a photograph which is viewed in the given dimensions, do they? 🙂
Anyhow, I love the composition and although it is something that is often seen, this pic does have a "different" feel to it.
I know resolution and quality are two different things but they are generally co related (My previous mobile P910i had a VGA camera but the qualtiy was good !)
After all who builds a 10 MP camera with a bad quality or a VGA with a good quality.
Deep capture.
Just a copy of what I posted on FB:
3MP is more than enough if the lens quality is good. (just as an example, your laptop screen is probably less than 1MP, full HD(1080p) screens are 2 MP), so unless you are printing a photo or cropping/post processing it in any way, anything above 2MP does not give you anything
Hey thanks for putting this up…I remember looking out the window of the bus I took from Blr airport to the city…a nice romantic song coming on the radio…thoughts in my head…just felt that I had to capture this!!…Quite agree with Dr. Vishaal